Trump had some good advice at the lecture: Think big, stay focused, keep your momentum, be a little paranoid (or be aware of what's going on and don't trust people too much), and my personal favorite, "to be a winner, you have to think like a winner." Other tips included: get a pre-nup and get even. I appreciate the honesty, though those aren't my rules of success. I think Mike loved every minute of it, but other than the good advice and his very motivational and endearing answers to a 9 and 10 year old, "I can tell you're smart, so study hard and you will be successful" and "You don't want to be like me. You just want to be you," he was a bit of a chauvinist and it was clear as day that he's one of those people you can characterize as a shark. I couldn't go through life with such a ruthless demeanor. And of course, he was cocky as hell. The lecture was pretty much what I expected, other than him espousing his political views. Who cares about Trump's political views? Hearing him speak was worth the money I put into it, $10. Salman Rushdie is coming sometime early next year. Now, that's a lecture I'd pay a whole Andrew Jackson to see.
I'm working right now at a law school alumni reception. 8:15 on a Saturday morning is not my ideal time to work. All I have to do is make sure the AV equipment is hooked up right and stand by for technical difficulties. Yippie. There's a 4' x 5' portrait of Robert Graves, poet and author, on the wall to my left. It's very detailed and life-like and his face takes up the entire canvas. It's so well painted, it's freaking me out a little. He has these piercing green eyes w/ blue flecks, a mane of white hair, and a very stern expression w/ furrowed brow. The artist, who must be mentioned for his talent of capturing every last detail, John Ulbright painted this in 1966.
Oh my God, I need coffee.
As you undoubtedly know if you have even a modicum of political interest, the first of three presidential debates transpired last Thursday. This debate centered around Bush's strongest topic, Homeland Security and the war. And, like the Trump debate, I wasn't impressed. Kerry possessed a very presidential air, while Bush looked like a petulant child whose mom keeps explaining to him why he can't do something. It's not a major point, but when representing your country, demeanor says a lot to your own people and the international community. Kerry had specific points and plans, while Bush diverted the questions sometimes and remained vague by simply touting that he would "make the world a better place." Yes, that obstensibly is the goal. Sure, George, I'll give you a few minutes to look that word up. Now, can we
please focus, like Kerry, on
how you plan to do this? Do your administration's means justify the end? Who the hell can figure it out when you haven't explained the means either b/c you don't have one or it's too crooked to reveal?